Environment details: North charleston SC
Moderate quality; pollution impacts noted.
Environment details: South pasadena CA
water quality is average; monitoring is necessary.
Compare Environment: North charleston SC vs South pasadena CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | North charleston | South pasadena |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 555 | 2592 |
Water Quality | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; pollution impacts noted. | water quality is average; monitoring is necessary. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.82 | 2.97 |
Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 54 | 205 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: North charleston vs South pasadena
- Both cities report the same water quality at 5/10.
- South pasadena has a better median air quality index at 3.0 compared to 2.0 in North charleston.
- Air quality is better in South pasadena with an average index of 2.97 compared to 1.82 in North charleston.
- South pasadena experiences more days with poor air quality at 205 compared to 54 in North charleston.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.