Demographics details for North andover, MA vs Clinton, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in North andover, MA vs Clinton, SC.

Data North andover Clinton
Population 31,296 7,554
Median Age 38.0 years 35.4 years
Median Income $114,000 $38,350
Married Families 6644.0% 19.0%
Poverty Level 5% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 4.5

Population Comparison: North andover vs Clinton

  • In North andover, the population is higher at 31,296, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
  • Residents in North andover have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
  • North andover has a higher median income of $114,000 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in North andover at 6644.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 5% in North andover.
  • Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in North andover.

Demographics

Demographics North andover vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic North andover Clinton
Black Data is updating 38
White 90 55
Asian 5 2
Hispanic 2 1
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: North andover vs Clinton

  • In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 0% in North andover.
  • North andover has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 55% in Clinton.
  • The Asian population is larger in North andover at 5% compared to 2% in Clinton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in North andover at 2% compared to 1% in Clinton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clinton at 4%, compared to 3% in North andover.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both North andover and Clinton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric North andover Clinton
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.0%
Depression Data is updating% 23.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 22.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 44.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: North andover vs Clinton

  • In Clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 0.0% in North andover.
  • Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in North andover.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level North andover Clinton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (74)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.3% (1,460)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.6% (1,177)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.3% (1,310)

Education Levels Comparison: North andover vs Clinton

  • In Clinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 0.0% in North andover.
  • In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in North andover.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.