Demographics details for Norman, OK vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norman, OK vs Fort lupton, CO.
| Data | Norman | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129,627 | 8,829 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $62,849 | $71,293 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Norman vs Fort lupton
- In Norman, the population is higher at 129,627, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
- The median age in Fort lupton is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 31.0 years in Norman.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $62,849 in Norman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norman at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- Norman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Norman and Fort lupton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Norman vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norman | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 67 | 26 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 53 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 20 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norman vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Norman at 5% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Norman has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- The Asian population is larger in Norman at 5% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 8% in Norman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 11% in Norman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norman at 4% compared to 1% in Fort lupton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norman | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norman vs Fort lupton
- More residents in Norman report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norman at 25.6% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norman at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 15.5% in Norman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norman at 34.9% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norman at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norman | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (396) | 1.6% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (12,171) | 16.2% (1,428) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (8,174) | 28.0% (2,476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (34,072) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norman vs Fort lupton
- In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Norman.
- In Fort lupton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 9.4% in Norman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 6.3% in Norman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.