Demographics details for Norman, OK vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norman, OK vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Norman | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129,627 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $62,849 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Norman vs Fairburn
- In Norman, the population is higher at 129,627, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Norman have a higher median age of 31.0 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $62,849 in Norman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norman at 35.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 12% in Norman.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Norman.
Demographics
Demographics Norman vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norman | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 73 |
| White | 67 | 12 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norman vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 5% in Norman.
- Norman has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Norman at 5% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Norman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norman at 11% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norman at 4% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norman | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norman vs Fairburn
- More residents in Norman report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norman at 25.6% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norman at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norman at 15.5% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norman at 34.9% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norman at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norman | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (396) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (12,171) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (8,174) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (34,072) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norman vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Norman.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 9.4% in Norman.
- More residents in Norman have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.