Demographics details for Norman, OK vs Chowchilla, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norman, OK vs Chowchilla, CA.
Data | Norman | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Population | 129,627 | 18,738 |
Median Age | 31.0 years | 34.1 years |
Median Income | $62,849 | $67,212 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Norman vs Chowchilla
- In Norman, the population is higher at 129,627, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
- The median age in Chowchilla is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 31.0 years in Norman.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212, compared to $62,849 in Norman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norman at 35.0% compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Chowchilla at 19%, compared to 12% in Norman.
- Chowchilla has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Norman.
Demographics
Demographics Norman vs Chowchilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norman | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 6 |
White | 67 | 29 |
Asian | 5 | 6 |
Hispanic | 8 | 48 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | 4 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Norman vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Norman.
- Norman has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- In Chowchilla, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 5% in Norman.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 8% in Norman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norman at 11% compared to 9% in Chowchilla.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norman at 4% compared to 2% in Chowchilla.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norman | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.1% |
Depression | 25.6% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norman vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.0% in Norman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norman at 25.6% compared to 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Norman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norman at 15.5% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 34.9% in Norman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norman at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norman | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (396) | 1.4% (271) |
High School Diploma | 9.4% (12,171) | 14.6% (2,738) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (8,174) | 31.2% (5,842) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (34,072) | 9.2% (1,731) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norman vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Norman.
- In Chowchilla, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 9.4% in Norman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chowchilla at 31.2%, compared to 6.3% in Norman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.