Demographics details for Normal, IL vs Sacred heart, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Normal, IL vs Sacred heart, MN.
| Data | Normal | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,838 | 498 |
| Median Age | 25.2 years | 53.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,965 | $59,107 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Normal vs Sacred heart
- In Normal, the population is higher at 52,838, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
- The median age in Sacred heart is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 25.2 years in Normal.
- Normal has a higher median income of $63,965 compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 29.0% in Normal.
- Normal has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
- The unemployment rate in Normal is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.1% in Sacred heart.
Demographics
Demographics Normal vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Normal | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 87 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Normal vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Normal at 13% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 73% in Normal.
- The Asian population is larger in Normal at 4% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- Sacred heart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 6% in Normal.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Normal at 4% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Normal and Sacred heart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Normal | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Normal vs Sacred heart
- More residents in Normal report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sacred heart at 23.3% versus 22.3% in Normal.
- Sacred heart has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 15.5% in Normal.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 16.5% in Normal.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 37.6%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 8.0% in Normal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Normal | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (44) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (4,307) | 28.1% (140) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (1,335) | 28.5% (142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.2% (14,346) | 13.3% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Normal vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of residents in Normal have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 8.2% in Normal.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacred heart at 28.5%, compared to 2.5% in Normal.
- A higher percentage of residents in Normal hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.