Demographics details for Normal, IL vs Port arthur, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Normal, IL vs Port arthur, TX.
| Data | Normal | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,838 | 55,579 |
| Median Age | 25.2 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $63,965 | $45,357 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 11.0 |
Population Comparison: Normal vs Port arthur
- The population in Port arthur is higher at 55,579, compared to 52,838 in Normal.
- The median age in Port arthur is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 25.2 years in Normal.
- Normal has a higher median income of $63,965 compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 29.0% in Normal.
- The poverty level is higher in Port arthur at 23%, compared to 12% in Normal.
- Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 5.5% in Normal.
Demographics
Demographics Normal vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Normal | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 43 |
| White | 73 | 3 |
| Asian | 4 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Normal vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 13% in Normal.
- Normal has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Normal.
- Port arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 6% in Normal.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port arthur at 13%, compared to 4% in Normal.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Normal.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Normal | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Normal vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.6% in Normal.
- Depression is more prevalent in Normal at 22.3% compared to 20.4% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 15.5% in Normal.
- Binge drinking is more common in Normal at 16.5% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 37.6% in Normal.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Normal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Normal | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (44) | 2.5% (1,383) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (4,307) | 19.6% (10,902) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (1,335) | 23.7% (13,180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.2% (14,346) | 7.1% (3,955) |
Education Levels Comparison: Normal vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.1% in Normal.
- In Port arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 8.2% in Normal.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port arthur at 23.7%, compared to 2.5% in Normal.
- A higher percentage of residents in Normal hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.