Demographics details for Norfolk, VA vs Pascagoula, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norfolk, VA vs Pascagoula, MS.
| Data | Norfolk | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 232,995 | 21,650 |
| Median Age | 32.2 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,998 | $41,679 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Norfolk vs Pascagoula
- In Norfolk, the population is higher at 232,995, compared to 21,650 in Pascagoula.
- The median age in Pascagoula is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 32.2 years in Norfolk.
- Norfolk has a higher median income of $60,998 compared to $41,679 in Pascagoula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norfolk at 30.0% compared to 28.0% in Pascagoula.
- The poverty level is higher in Pascagoula at 16%, compared to 11% in Norfolk.
- Pascagoula has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.4% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Norfolk vs Pascagoula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norfolk | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 41 | 37 |
| White | 39 | 45 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norfolk vs Pascagoula
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Norfolk at 41% compared to 37% in Pascagoula.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pascagoula at 45% compared to 39% in Norfolk.
- The Asian population is larger in Norfolk at 4% compared to 1% in Pascagoula.
- Pascagoula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 9% in Norfolk.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norfolk at 7% compared to 4% in Pascagoula.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norfolk and Pascagoula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norfolk | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 42.9% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norfolk vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Norfolk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pascagoula at 22.5% versus 20.8% in Norfolk.
- Pascagoula has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 18.9% in Norfolk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norfolk at 17.5% compared to 14.2% in Pascagoula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norfolk at 42.9% compared to 38.9% in Pascagoula.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pascagoula at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Norfolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norfolk | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (2,387) | 1.1% (237) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (30,020) | 15.1% (3,262) |
| Less than High School | 9.5% (22,233) | 12.2% (2,644) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (48,995) | 11.6% (2,521) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norfolk vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Norfolk.
- In Pascagoula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 12.9% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pascagoula at 12.2%, compared to 9.5% in Norfolk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 11.6% in Pascagoula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.