Demographics details for Norfolk, NE vs Wadesboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norfolk, NE vs Wadesboro, NC.
| Data | Norfolk | Wadesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,928 | 4,966 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $57,479 | $32,022 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Norfolk vs Wadesboro
- In Norfolk, the population is higher at 25,928, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- The median age in Wadesboro is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 36.8 years in Norfolk.
- Norfolk has a higher median income of $57,479 compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norfolk at 38.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- Norfolk has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- Wadesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Norfolk vs Wadesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norfolk | Wadesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 70 |
| White | 75 | 25 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 14 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norfolk vs Wadesboro
- In Wadesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 1% in Norfolk.
- Norfolk has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- In Wadesboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Norfolk.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Norfolk at 14% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norfolk at 8% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norfolk at 1% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norfolk | Wadesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 22.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norfolk vs Wadesboro
- In Wadesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.3% in Norfolk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wadesboro at 21.6% versus 18.5% in Norfolk.
- Wadesboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 16.9% in Norfolk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norfolk at 21.4% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
- Wadesboro has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 37.1% in Norfolk.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Norfolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norfolk | Wadesboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (340) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (4,708) | 19.2% (953) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,107) | 11.8% (587) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (4,308) | 9.5% (472) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norfolk vs Wadesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- In Wadesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 18.2% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wadesboro at 11.8%, compared to 8.1% in Norfolk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.