Demographics details for Norfolk, NE vs Fort dodge, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norfolk, NE vs Fort dodge, IA.
| Data | Norfolk | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,928 | 24,657 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,479 | $59,452 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort dodge
- In Norfolk, the population is higher at 25,928, compared to 24,657 in Fort dodge.
- The median age in Fort dodge is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 36.8 years in Norfolk.
- Fort dodge has a higher median income of $59,452, compared to $57,479 in Norfolk.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norfolk at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- Norfolk has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Norfolk vs Fort dodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norfolk | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 75 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort dodge at 79% compared to 75% in Norfolk.
- In Fort dodge, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Norfolk.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Norfolk at 14% compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norfolk at 8% compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norfolk at 1% compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norfolk | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 21.2% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.3% in Norfolk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort dodge at 19.3% versus 18.5% in Norfolk.
- Fort dodge has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 16.9% in Norfolk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norfolk at 21.4% compared to 21.2% in Fort dodge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norfolk at 37.1% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort dodge at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Norfolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norfolk | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (340) | 0.7% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (4,708) | 18.8% (4,633) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,107) | 12.2% (2,998) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (4,308) | 13.8% (3,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort dodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- In Fort dodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort dodge at 12.2%, compared to 8.1% in Norfolk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.