Demographics details for Norfolk, CT vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norfolk, CT vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Norfolk | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,685 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 52.0 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $76,382 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Norfolk vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 1,685 in Norfolk.
- Residents in Norfolk have a higher median age of 52.0 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Norfolk has a higher median income of $76,382 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norfolk at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 4% in Norfolk.
- Provo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.7% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Norfolk vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norfolk | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 87 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norfolk vs Provo
- In Provo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Norfolk.
- Norfolk has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 69% in Provo.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Norfolk.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 8% in Norfolk.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norfolk.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norfolk | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norfolk vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Provo has a higher smoking rate at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Provo at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Provo has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norfolk at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norfolk | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (275) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (115) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (610) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norfolk vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Norfolk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Norfolk have less than a high school education at 6.8% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.