Demographics details for Norfolk, CT vs Fort leonard wood, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norfolk, CT vs Fort leonard wood, MO.
Data | Norfolk | Fort leonard wood |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,685 | 15,615 |
Median Age | 52.0 years | 20.6 years |
Median Income | $76,382 | $64,890 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort leonard wood
- The population in Fort leonard wood is higher at 15,615, compared to 1,685 in Norfolk.
- Residents in Norfolk have a higher median age of 52.0 years compared to 20.6 years in Fort leonard wood.
- Norfolk has a higher median income of $76,382 compared to $64,890 in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norfolk at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Norfolk has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.7% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Norfolk vs Fort leonard wood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norfolk | Fort leonard wood |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 18 |
White | 87 | 35 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort leonard wood
- In Fort leonard wood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Norfolk.
- Norfolk has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 35% in Fort leonard wood.
- In Fort leonard wood, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Norfolk.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 4% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort leonard wood at 18%, compared to 8% in Norfolk.
- In Fort leonard wood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norfolk.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norfolk | Fort leonard wood |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 21.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 6.6% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 24.0% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 12.8% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 25.4% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 30.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort leonard wood
- In Fort leonard wood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort leonard wood at 24.0% versus 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher smoking rate at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort leonard wood at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Fort leonard wood has higher obesity rates at 30.7% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norfolk at 13.0% compared to 2.0% in Fort leonard wood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norfolk | Fort leonard wood |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.2% (38) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (275) | 4.5% (700) |
Less than High School | 6.8% (115) | 0.8% (119) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (610) | 9.3% (1,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norfolk vs Fort leonard wood
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Norfolk and Fort leonard wood at 0.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 4.5% in Fort leonard wood.
- More residents in Norfolk have less than a high school education at 6.8% compared to 0.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 9.3% in Fort leonard wood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.