Demographics details for Norfolk, CT vs Bell gardens, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Norfolk, CT vs Bell gardens, CA.

Data Norfolk Bell gardens
Population 1,685 37,927
Median Age 52.0 years 31.1 years
Median Income $76,382 $53,935
Married Families 44.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 4% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 6.7

Population Comparison: Norfolk vs Bell gardens

  • The population in Bell gardens is higher at 37,927, compared to 1,685 in Norfolk.
  • Residents in Norfolk have a higher median age of 52.0 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
  • Norfolk has a higher median income of $76,382 compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Norfolk at 44.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bell gardens at 15%, compared to 4% in Norfolk.
  • Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 2.7% in Norfolk.

Demographics

Demographics Norfolk vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Norfolk Bell gardens
Black Data is updating 1
White 87 -35
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 99
Two or More Races 8 34
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Norfolk vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Norfolk.
  • Norfolk has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
  • The Asian population is larger in Norfolk at 1% compared to 0% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 4% in Norfolk.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 8% in Norfolk.
  • In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norfolk.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Norfolk Bell gardens
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.9%
Depression Data is updating% 17.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 16.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Norfolk vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bell gardens at 17.5% versus 0.0% in Norfolk.
  • Bell gardens has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bell gardens at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
  • Bell gardens has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Norfolk at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Norfolk Bell gardens
No Schooling 0.2% (3) 4.5% (1,722)
High School Diploma 16.3% (275) 16.9% (6,418)
Less than High School 6.8% (115) 60.8% (23,053)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.2% (610) 3.9% (1,476)

Education Levels Comparison: Norfolk vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.2% in Norfolk.
  • In Bell gardens, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Norfolk.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 6.8% in Norfolk.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Norfolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.