Demographics details for Norco, CA vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norco, CA vs Junction city, KS.
Data | Norco | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,042 | 22,264 |
Median Age | 41.4 years | 28.5 years |
Median Income | $120,636 | $60,709 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Norco vs Junction city
- In Norco, the population is higher at 25,042, compared to 22,264 in Junction city.
- Residents in Norco have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Norco has a higher median income of $120,636 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norco at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
- The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 8% in Norco.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.4% in Norco.
Demographics
Demographics Norco vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norco | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 20 |
White | 43 | 43 |
Asian | 4 | 3 |
Hispanic | 39 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norco vs Junction city
- In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 3% in Norco.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Norco and Junction city at 43%.
- The Asian population is larger in Norco at 4% compared to 3% in Junction city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Norco at 39% compared to 18% in Junction city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 11% in Norco.
- In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norco.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norco | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 11.0% |
Depression | 16.7% | 19.2% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norco vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Norco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 19.2% versus 16.7% in Norco.
- Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 13.0% in Norco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norco at 18.8% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
- Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 34.6% in Norco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Norco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norco | Junction city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (356) | 1.0% (216) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (5,436) | 12.4% (2,755) |
Less than High School | 18.2% (4,553) | 6.9% (1,535) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (3,888) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norco vs Junction city
- A higher percentage of residents in Norco have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norco hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Norco have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.