Demographics details for Newton, MA vs Orefield, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newton, MA vs Orefield, PA.
| Data | Newton | Orefield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,381 | 945 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $176,373 | $72,000 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 65.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Newton vs Orefield
- In Newton, the population is higher at 87,381, compared to 945 in Orefield.
- Residents in Newton have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 40.0 years in Orefield.
- Newton has a higher median income of $176,373 compared to $72,000 in Orefield.
- In Orefield, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 47.0% in Newton.
- Newton has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Orefield.
- The unemployment rate in Newton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Orefield.
Demographics
Demographics Newton vs Orefield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newton | Orefield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 73 | 90 |
| Asian | 14 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newton vs Orefield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newton at 3% compared to 2% in Orefield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Orefield at 90% compared to 73% in Newton.
- The Asian population is larger in Newton at 14% compared to 2% in Orefield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newton at 4% compared to 3% in Orefield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newton at 6% compared to 3% in Orefield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newton and Orefield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newton | Orefield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 21.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newton vs Orefield
- More residents in Newton report poor mental health at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newton at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newton at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newton at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newton at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newton at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newton | Orefield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (413) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.5% (3,941) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 2.9% (2,554) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.7% (47,769) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newton vs Orefield
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a high school diploma at 4.5% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- More residents in Newton have less than a high school education at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.7% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.