Demographics details for Newton, KS vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newton, KS vs Meadville, PA.
| Data | Newton | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,392 | 12,680 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,528 | $46,157 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Newton vs Meadville
- In Newton, the population is higher at 18,392, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Newton have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Newton has a higher median income of $66,528 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Newton at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 9% in Newton.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.4% in Newton.
Demographics
Demographics Newton vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newton | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 66 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newton vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Newton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 66% in Newton.
- In Meadville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Newton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newton at 20% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newton at 11% compared to 6% in Meadville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Newton at 1% compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newton | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newton vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.5% in Newton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 21.3% in Newton.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.1% in Newton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newton at 17.3% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 40.1% in Newton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Newton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newton | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (92) | 0.2% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,807) | 24.5% (3,110) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (2,127) | 8.6% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (3,576) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newton vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 15.3% in Newton.
- More residents in Newton have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.