Demographics details for Newton, KS vs Lake leelanau, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newton, KS vs Lake leelanau, MI.
Data | Newton | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,392 | 165 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 27.9 years |
Median Income | $66,528 | $48,125 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Newton vs Lake leelanau
- In Newton, the population is higher at 18,392, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
- Residents in Newton have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
- Newton has a higher median income of $66,528 compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Newton at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
- The poverty level is identical in both Newton and Lake leelanau at 9%.
- Lake leelanau has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.4% in Newton.
Demographics
Demographics Newton vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Newton | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 66 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newton vs Lake leelanau
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newton at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 66% in Newton.
- Both Newton and Lake leelanau have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newton at 20% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newton at 11% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Newton at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Newton | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 8.4% |
Depression | 21.3% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 40.1% | 31.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newton vs Lake leelanau
- More residents in Newton report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lake leelanau at 22.5% versus 21.3% in Newton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newton at 16.1% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 17.3% in Newton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newton at 40.1% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Newton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Newton | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (92) | 2.4% (4) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,807) | 13.3% (22) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (2,127) | 4.8% (8) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (3,576) | 13.9% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newton vs Lake leelanau
- In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.5% in Newton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 13.3% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents in Newton have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 13.9% in Lake leelanau.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.