Demographics details for Newton, KS vs Keiser, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newton, KS vs Keiser, AR.
| Data | Newton | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,392 | 713 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $66,528 | $50,136 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Newton vs Keiser
- In Newton, the population is higher at 18,392, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- The median age in Keiser is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 40.1 years in Newton.
- Newton has a higher median income of $66,528 compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Newton at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Keiser.
- The poverty level is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 9% in Newton.
- Keiser has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Newton.
Demographics
Demographics Newton vs Keiser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newton | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 66 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newton vs Keiser
- In Keiser, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Newton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keiser at 83% compared to 66% in Newton.
- Both Newton and Keiser have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newton at 20% compared to 1% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 11% in Newton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Newton at 1% compared to 0% in Keiser.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newton | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newton vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 15.5% in Newton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keiser at 28.9% versus 21.3% in Newton.
- Keiser has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 16.1% in Newton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newton at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newton at 40.1% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Newton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newton | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (92) | 6.2% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,807) | 15.0% (107) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (2,127) | 55.5% (396) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (3,576) | 7.3% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newton vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.5% in Newton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 15.0% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keiser at 55.5%, compared to 11.6% in Newton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.