Demographics details for Newton, GA vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newton, GA vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Newton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 579 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $31,406 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Newton vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 579 in Newton.
- Residents in Newton have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $31,406 in Newton.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 22.0% in Newton.
- Newton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.2% in Newton.
Demographics
Demographics Newton vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 4 |
| White | 63 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Newton vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newton at 34% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Newton has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Newton.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 1% in Newton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 1% in Newton.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Newton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newton vs Coalinga
- More residents in Newton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newton at 21.6% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newton at 23.1% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 13.4% in Newton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newton at 42.7% compared to 39.1% in Coalinga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newton at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (7) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (96) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (112) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (55) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newton vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.2% in Newton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 19.3% in Newton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.5% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.