Demographics details for Newport, TN vs Graceville, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newport, TN vs Graceville, FL.
| Data | Newport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,901 | 2,175 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $35,784 | $36,625 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Newport vs Graceville
- In Newport, the population is higher at 6,901, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- Residents in Newport have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher median income of $36,625, compared to $35,784 in Newport.
- In Graceville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Newport.
- Newport has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in Graceville.
- The unemployment rate in Newport is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Newport vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 32 |
| White | 84 | 59 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newport vs Graceville
- In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 1% in Newport.
- Newport has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- The Asian population is larger in Newport at 2% compared to 1% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Newport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newport at 8% compared to 2% in Graceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newport and Graceville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.4% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 31.2% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 28.4% | 24.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newport vs Graceville
- More residents in Newport report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 18.6% in Graceville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newport at 31.2% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newport at 28.4% compared to 24.4% in Graceville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 13.6% in Newport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newport at 40.3% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newport at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Graceville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (23) | 2.7% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (1,613) | 25.3% (550) |
| Less than High School | 21.6% (1,490) | 22.5% (490) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (519) | 15.2% (331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newport vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Newport.
- In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 23.4% in Newport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 21.6% in Newport.
- In Graceville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 7.5% in Newport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.