Demographics details for Newport, OR vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newport, OR vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Newport | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,412 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 47.9 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $57,511 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Newport vs Sulphur
- In Newport, the population is higher at 10,412, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Newport have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Newport has a higher median income of $57,511 compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Newport at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 12% in Newport.
- The unemployment rate in Newport is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Newport vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newport | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 73 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Newport vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Newport.
- Newport has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- The Asian population is larger in Newport at 2% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newport at 16% compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 7% in Newport.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 1% in Newport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newport | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newport vs Sulphur
- More residents in Newport report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.2% in Sulphur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newport at 28.2% compared to 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 16.5% in Newport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newport at 17.2% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 35.7% in Newport.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Newport and Sulphur at 19.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newport | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (100) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (1,476) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,340) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (2,319) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newport vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.0% in Newport.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.2% in Newport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 12.9% in Newport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.