Demographics details for Newport, AR vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newport, AR vs Fairborn, OH.
| Data | Newport | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,967 | 34,977 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $32,440 | $53,783 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Newport vs Fairborn
- The population in Fairborn is higher at 34,977, compared to 7,967 in Newport.
- Residents in Newport have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher median income of $53,783, compared to $32,440 in Newport.
- In Fairborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 24.0% in Newport.
- Newport has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Newport.
Demographics
Demographics Newport vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newport | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 9 |
| White | 60 | 78 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newport vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newport at 21% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairborn at 78% compared to 60% in Newport.
- Both Newport and Fairborn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newport at 5% compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newport at 13% compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newport and Fairborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newport | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 27.9% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newport vs Fairborn
- More residents in Newport report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.3% in Fairborn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newport at 27.4% compared to 23.4% in Fairborn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newport at 27.9% compared to 20.5% in Fairborn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairborn at 16.3% compared to 13.1% in Newport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newport at 42.3% compared to 39.7% in Fairborn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newport at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Fairborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newport | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (50) | 0.3% (116) |
| High School Diploma | 22.4% (1,787) | 13.2% (4,620) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (1,399) | 12.5% (4,382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (621) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newport vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Newport have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newport hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Newport have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- In Fairborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 7.8% in Newport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.