Demographics details for Newport beach, CA vs Potts camp, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Newport beach, CA vs Potts camp, MS.

Data Newport beach Potts camp
Population 83,993 409
Median Age 46.7 years 45.6 years
Median Income $149,471 $21,845
Married Families 45.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 6% 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Newport beach vs Potts camp

  • In Newport beach, the population is higher at 83,993, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
  • Residents in Newport beach have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 45.6 years in Potts camp.
  • Newport beach has a higher median income of $149,471 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Newport beach at 45.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 6% in Newport beach.
  • Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Newport beach.

Demographics

Demographics Newport beach vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Newport beach Potts camp
Black 1 13
White 71 80
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Newport beach vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Newport beach.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 71% in Newport beach.
  • The Asian population is larger in Newport beach at 8% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Newport beach at 11% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Newport beach at 9% compared to 7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newport beach and Potts camp at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Newport beach Potts camp
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.5% 13.0%
Depression 18.2% 23.0%
Smoking 7.3% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 13.8%
Obesity 23.5% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Newport beach vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 13.2% in Newport beach.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Potts camp at 23.0% versus 18.2% in Newport beach.
  • Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 7.3% in Newport beach.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Newport beach at 18.7% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 23.5% in Newport beach.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Newport beach.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Newport beach Potts camp
No Schooling 0.5% (429) 0.5% (2)
High School Diploma 5.1% (4,249) 13.7% (56)
Less than High School 3.7% (3,142) 12.0% (49)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.0% (44,551) 8.1% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Newport beach vs Potts camp

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Newport beach and Potts camp at 0.5%.
  • In Potts camp, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 5.1% in Newport beach.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Potts camp at 12.0%, compared to 3.7% in Newport beach.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Newport beach hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.0% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.