Demographics details for Newark, OH vs Interlachen, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, OH vs Interlachen, FL.
| Data | Newark | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,763 | 1,457 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $56,284 | $50,776 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Interlachen
- In Newark, the population is higher at 50,763, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
- The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 38.5 years in Newark.
- Newark has a higher median income of $56,284 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
- In Interlachen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is identical in both Newark and Interlachen at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Interlachen.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newark | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 11 |
| White | 88 | 37 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 37% in Interlachen.
- The Asian population is larger in Newark at 1% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
- Interlachen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 3% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Interlachen at 18%, compared to 5% in Newark.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newark and Interlachen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newark | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Interlachen
- More residents in Newark report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in Interlachen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newark at 26.0% compared to 20.3% in Interlachen.
- Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 23.2% in Newark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newark at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Interlachen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 41.9% compared to 35.5% in Interlachen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newark at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Interlachen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newark | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (258) | 2.0% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (10,967) | 22.0% (320) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (5,370) | 41.7% (607) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (7,627) | 10.4% (151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Newark.
- In Interlachen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 21.6% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 10.6% in Newark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.