Demographics details for Newark, OH vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, OH vs Fort smith, AR.
Data | Newark | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Population | 50,763 | 89,992 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $56,284 | $50,799 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 50,763 in Newark.
- Residents in Newark have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
- Newark has a higher median income of $56,284 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is identical in both Newark and Fort smith at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Newark | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 8 |
White | 88 | 57 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 3 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Newark.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 3% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort smith at 9%, compared to 5% in Newark.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Newark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Newark | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.7% |
Depression | 26.0% | 27.8% |
Smoking | 23.2% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 41.9% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Newark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 26.0% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newark at 23.2% compared to 21.8% in Fort smith.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newark at 16.8% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 41.9% compared to 39.5% in Fort smith.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Newark and Fort smith at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Newark | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (258) | 2.3% (2,029) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (10,967) | 14.8% (13,356) |
Less than High School | 10.6% (5,370) | 19.8% (17,822) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (7,627) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.5% in Newark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort smith at 19.8%, compared to 10.6% in Newark.
- In Fort smith, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 15.0% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.