Demographics details for Newark, OH vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, OH vs Central point, OR.
| Data | Newark | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,763 | 19,222 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,284 | $79,731 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Central point
- In Newark, the population is higher at 50,763, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 38.5 years in Newark.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $56,284 in Newark.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Central point.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Central point.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newark | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newark at 3% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Newark has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 76% in Central point.
- Both Newark and Central point have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 3% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 5% in Newark.
- In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Newark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newark | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Central point
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Newark and Central point at 19.4%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 26.0% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newark at 23.2% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newark at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 41.9% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newark at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newark | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (258) | 1.7% (319) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (10,967) | 16.1% (3,095) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (5,370) | 13.2% (2,530) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (7,627) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Newark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 10.6% in Newark.
- In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 15.0% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.