Demographics details for Newark, NJ vs Pleasant hill, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, NJ vs Pleasant hill, CA.
| Data | Newark | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 305,344 | 33,913 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,460 | $137,685 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.8 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Pleasant hill
- In Newark, the population is higher at 305,344, compared to 33,913 in Pleasant hill.
- The median age in Pleasant hill is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685, compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 7.8%, compared to 4.6% in Pleasant hill.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newark | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 47 | 4 |
| White | 3 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Pleasant hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newark at 47% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 54% compared to 3% in Newark.
- In Pleasant hill, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 2% in Newark.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newark at 37% compared to 14% in Pleasant hill.
- Both Newark and Pleasant hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newark and Pleasant hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newark | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 8.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 22.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Pleasant hill
- More residents in Newark report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newark at 18.2% compared to 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newark at 19.5% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasant hill at 17.7% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 38.5% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newark at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Pleasant hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newark | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (7,516) | 1.4% (469) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (66,812) | 7.5% (2,527) |
| Less than High School | 24.1% (73,461) | 5.8% (1,962) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33,938) | 40.9% (13,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Pleasant hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.4% in Pleasant hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents in Newark have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 11.1% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.