Demographics details for Newark, NJ vs Catlettsburg, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, NJ vs Catlettsburg, KY.
Data | Newark | Catlettsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 305,344 | 1,746 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 48.0 years |
Median Income | $46,460 | $33,047 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Catlettsburg
- In Newark, the population is higher at 305,344, compared to 1,746 in Catlettsburg.
- The median age in Catlettsburg is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Newark has a higher median income of $46,460 compared to $33,047 in Catlettsburg.
- In Catlettsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 12% in Catlettsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 7.8%, compared to 5.0% in Catlettsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Catlettsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Newark | Catlettsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 47 | 5 |
White | 3 | 90 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 37 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Catlettsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newark at 47% compared to 5% in Catlettsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Catlettsburg at 90% compared to 3% in Newark.
- The Asian population is larger in Newark at 2% compared to 0% in Catlettsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newark at 37% compared to 1% in Catlettsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newark at 11% compared to 4% in Catlettsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newark and Catlettsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Newark | Catlettsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 22.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.0% |
Depression | 18.2% | 32.9% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 29.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 42.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Catlettsburg
- In Catlettsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 17.1% in Newark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Catlettsburg at 32.9% versus 18.2% in Newark.
- Catlettsburg has a higher smoking rate at 29.0% compared to 19.5% in Newark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newark at 13.9% compared to 13.5% in Catlettsburg.
- Catlettsburg has higher obesity rates at 42.8% compared to 38.5% in Newark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Catlettsburg at 32.0% compared to 16.0% in Newark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Newark | Catlettsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (7,516) | 2.9% (50) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (66,812) | 28.8% (502) |
Less than High School | 24.1% (73,461) | 33.4% (584) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33,938) | 4.6% (80) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Catlettsburg
- In Catlettsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.5% in Newark.
- In Catlettsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 21.9% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Catlettsburg at 33.4%, compared to 24.1% in Newark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 4.6% in Catlettsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.