Demographics details for New roads, LA vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New roads, LA vs Tacoma, WA.
Data | New roads | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,383 | 221,776 |
Median Age | 46.5 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $47,792 | $79,085 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: New roads vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 4,383 in New roads.
- Residents in New roads have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $47,792 in New roads.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in New roads.
- New roads has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in New roads is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics New roads vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New roads | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 11 |
White | 42 | 53 |
Asian | 1 | 9 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: New roads vs Tacoma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New roads at 53% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tacoma at 53% compared to 42% in New roads.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in New roads.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in New roads.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 4% in New roads.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in New roads.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New roads | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.9% |
Depression | 25.9% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 22.8% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New roads vs Tacoma
- More residents in New roads report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.9% in Tacoma.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 25.9% in New roads.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New roads at 22.8% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both New roads and Tacoma at 16.2%.
- Obesity rates are higher in New roads at 42.7% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are higher in New roads at 31.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New roads | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (23) | 1.6% (3,474) |
High School Diploma | 28.7% (1,260) | 14.2% (31,504) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (701) | 10.1% (22,501) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (559) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: New roads vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in New roads.
- A higher percentage of residents in New roads hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- More residents in New roads have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 12.8% in New roads.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.