Demographics details for New roads, LA vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New roads, LA vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | New roads | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,383 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 46.5 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,792 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: New roads vs Pea ridge
- The population in Pea ridge is higher at 7,852, compared to 4,383 in New roads.
- Residents in New roads have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $47,792 in New roads.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in New roads.
- New roads has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- The unemployment rate in New roads is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics New roads vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New roads | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 4 |
| White | 42 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: New roads vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New roads at 53% compared to 4% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pea ridge at 70% compared to 42% in New roads.
- Both New roads and Pea ridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Pea ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in New roads.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 4% in New roads.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New roads.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New roads | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New roads vs Pea ridge
- More residents in New roads report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Pea ridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in New roads at 25.9% compared to 25.0% in Pea ridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New roads at 22.8% compared to 17.9% in Pea ridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in New roads.
- Obesity rates are higher in New roads at 42.7% compared to 34.8% in Pea ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in New roads at 31.0% compared to 12.0% in Pea ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New roads | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (23) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (1,260) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (701) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (559) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: New roads vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in New roads have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in New roads hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 17.7% in Pea ridge.
- More residents in New roads have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.8% in New roads.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.