Demographics details for New roads, LA vs Lucedale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New roads, LA vs Lucedale, MS.
| Data | New roads | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,383 | 2,988 |
| Median Age | 46.5 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $47,792 | $35,662 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: New roads vs Lucedale
- In New roads, the population is higher at 4,383, compared to 2,988 in Lucedale.
- Residents in New roads have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 37.3 years in Lucedale.
- New roads has a higher median income of $47,792 compared to $35,662 in Lucedale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in New roads at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Lucedale.
- The poverty level is higher in Lucedale at 25%, compared to 20% in New roads.
- The unemployment rate in New roads is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Lucedale.
Demographics
Demographics New roads vs Lucedale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New roads | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 33 |
| White | 42 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New roads vs Lucedale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New roads at 53% compared to 33% in Lucedale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lucedale at 63% compared to 42% in New roads.
- The Asian population is larger in New roads at 1% compared to 0% in Lucedale.
- Lucedale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in New roads.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New roads at 4% compared to 3% in Lucedale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New roads and Lucedale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New roads | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New roads vs Lucedale
- More residents in New roads report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.8% in Lucedale.
- Depression is more prevalent in New roads at 25.9% compared to 21.3% in Lucedale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New roads at 22.8% compared to 21.4% in Lucedale.
- Binge drinking is more common in New roads at 16.2% compared to 14.7% in Lucedale.
- Obesity rates are higher in New roads at 42.7% compared to 41.2% in Lucedale.
- Disability percentages are higher in New roads at 31.0% compared to 12.0% in Lucedale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New roads | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (23) | 0.6% (18) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (1,260) | 14.1% (421) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (701) | 21.8% (651) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (559) | 11.9% (356) |
Education Levels Comparison: New roads vs Lucedale
- In Lucedale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in New roads.
- A higher percentage of residents in New roads hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 14.1% in Lucedale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lucedale at 21.8%, compared to 16.0% in New roads.
- A higher percentage of residents in New roads hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 11.9% in Lucedale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.