Demographics details for New richmond, OH vs Paupack, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New richmond, OH vs Paupack, PA.
Data | New richmond | Paupack |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,753 | 1,000 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $76,760 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 300.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: New richmond vs Paupack
- In New richmond, the population is higher at 2,753, compared to 1,000 in Paupack.
- The median age in Paupack is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 39.5 years in New richmond.
- New richmond has a higher median income of $76,760 compared to $60,000 in Paupack.
- In Paupack, the percentage of married families is higher at 300.0%, compared to 45.0% in New richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Paupack at 8%, compared to 7% in New richmond.
- Paupack has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in New richmond.
Demographics
Demographics New richmond vs Paupack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New richmond | Paupack |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 89 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New richmond vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New richmond at 4% compared to 2% in Paupack.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Paupack at 90% compared to 89% in New richmond.
- In Paupack, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in New richmond.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both New richmond and Paupack at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New richmond at 4% compared to 0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New richmond and Paupack at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New richmond | Paupack |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 24.9% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 38.1% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New richmond vs Paupack
- More residents in New richmond report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Depression is more prevalent in New richmond at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New richmond at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Binge drinking is more common in New richmond at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Obesity rates are higher in New richmond at 38.1% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Disability percentages are higher in New richmond at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New richmond | Paupack |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.4% (643) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (498) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (369) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: New richmond vs Paupack
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both New richmond and Paupack at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in New richmond hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- More residents in New richmond have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in New richmond hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.