Demographics details for New richmond, OH vs Fort dodge, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New richmond, OH vs Fort dodge, IA.
Data | New richmond | Fort dodge |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,753 | 24,657 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $76,760 | $59,452 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: New richmond vs Fort dodge
- The population in Fort dodge is higher at 24,657, compared to 2,753 in New richmond.
- Residents in New richmond have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- New richmond has a higher median income of $76,760 compared to $59,452 in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in New richmond at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- New richmond has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in New richmond.
Demographics
Demographics New richmond vs Fort dodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New richmond | Fort dodge |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 5 |
White | 89 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New richmond vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in New richmond.
- New richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 79% in Fort dodge.
- In Fort dodge, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in New richmond.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in New richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort dodge at 7%, compared to 4% in New richmond.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New richmond and Fort dodge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New richmond | Fort dodge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 11.2% |
Depression | 25.5% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 24.9% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 21.2% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 35.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New richmond vs Fort dodge
- More residents in New richmond report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Depression is more prevalent in New richmond at 25.5% compared to 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New richmond at 24.9% compared to 20.1% in Fort dodge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 19.0% in New richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in New richmond at 38.1% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- Disability percentages are higher in New richmond at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Fort dodge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New richmond | Fort dodge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (163) |
High School Diploma | 23.4% (643) | 18.8% (4,633) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (498) | 12.2% (2,998) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (369) | 13.8% (3,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: New richmond vs Fort dodge
- In Fort dodge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in New richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in New richmond hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 18.8% in Fort dodge.
- More residents in New richmond have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 12.2% in Fort dodge.
- In Fort dodge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 13.4% in New richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.