Demographics details for New richmond, OH vs Farmington, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New richmond, OH vs Farmington, MN.
Data | New richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,753 | 23,566 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $76,760 | $114,737 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington
- The population in Farmington is higher at 23,566, compared to 2,753 in New richmond.
- Residents in New richmond have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737, compared to $76,760 in New richmond.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in New richmond at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
- New richmond has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both New richmond and Farmington at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics New richmond vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 3 |
White | 89 | 85 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New richmond at 4% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- New richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 85% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in New richmond.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in New richmond.
- Both New richmond and Farmington have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New richmond and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.2% |
Depression | 25.5% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 24.9% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington
- More residents in New richmond report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in New richmond at 25.5% compared to 22.6% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New richmond at 24.9% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in New richmond at 19.0% compared to 18.9% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in New richmond at 38.1% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in New richmond at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (86) |
High School Diploma | 23.4% (643) | 11.3% (2,674) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (498) | 7.1% (1,662) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (369) | 23.4% (5,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in New richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in New richmond hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- More residents in New richmond have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 13.4% in New richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.