Demographics details for New richmond, OH vs Farmington, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in New richmond, OH vs Farmington, MN.

Data New richmond Farmington
Population 2,753 23,566
Median Age 39.5 years 35.1 years
Median Income $76,760 $114,737
Married Families 45.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 7% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington

  • The population in Farmington is higher at 23,566, compared to 2,753 in New richmond.
  • Residents in New richmond have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 35.1 years in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737, compared to $76,760 in New richmond.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in New richmond at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
  • New richmond has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Farmington.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both New richmond and Farmington at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics New richmond vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic New richmond Farmington
Black 4 3
White 89 85
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in New richmond at 4% compared to 3% in Farmington.
  • New richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 85% in Farmington.
  • In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in New richmond.
  • Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in New richmond.
  • Both New richmond and Farmington have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New richmond and Farmington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric New richmond Farmington
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 13.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 8.2%
Depression 25.5% 22.6%
Smoking 24.9% 13.7%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 18.9%
Obesity 38.1% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington

  • More residents in New richmond report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in New richmond at 25.5% compared to 22.6% in Farmington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in New richmond at 24.9% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in New richmond at 19.0% compared to 18.9% in Farmington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in New richmond at 38.1% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in New richmond at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level New richmond Farmington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (86)
High School Diploma 23.4% (643) 11.3% (2,674)
Less than High School 18.1% (498) 7.1% (1,662)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (369) 23.4% (5,505)

Education Levels Comparison: New richmond vs Farmington

  • In Farmington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in New richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in New richmond hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
  • More residents in New richmond have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
  • In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 13.4% in New richmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.