Demographics details for New philadelphia, OH vs Richlands, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in New philadelphia, OH vs Richlands, NC.

Data New philadelphia Richlands
Population 17,437 2,355
Median Age 42.8 years 28.9 years
Median Income $55,590 $59,333
Married Families 38.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 15% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.5

Population Comparison: New philadelphia vs Richlands

  • In New philadelphia, the population is higher at 17,437, compared to 2,355 in Richlands.
  • Residents in New philadelphia have a higher median age of 42.8 years compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
  • Richlands has a higher median income of $59,333, compared to $55,590 in New philadelphia.
  • In Richlands, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in New philadelphia.
  • New philadelphia has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Richlands.
  • Richlands has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in New philadelphia.

Demographics

Demographics New philadelphia vs Richlands provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic New philadelphia Richlands
Black 1 17
White 88 65
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 8 10
Two or More Races 2 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: New philadelphia vs Richlands

  • In Richlands, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in New philadelphia.
  • New philadelphia has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 65% in Richlands.
  • Both New philadelphia and Richlands have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Richlands has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in New philadelphia.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richlands at 7%, compared to 2% in New philadelphia.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New philadelphia and Richlands at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric New philadelphia Richlands
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 10.7%
Depression 24.3% 23.5%
Smoking 24.7% 16.6%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 17.4%
Obesity 41.3% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: New philadelphia vs Richlands

  • More residents in New philadelphia report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Richlands.
  • Depression is more prevalent in New philadelphia at 24.3% compared to 23.5% in Richlands.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in New philadelphia at 24.7% compared to 16.6% in Richlands.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Richlands at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in New philadelphia.
  • Obesity rates are higher in New philadelphia at 41.3% compared to 36.7% in Richlands.
  • Disability percentages are higher in New philadelphia at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level New philadelphia Richlands
No Schooling 0.6% (108) 0.8% (20)
High School Diploma 26.5% (4,618) 18.9% (445)
Less than High School 11.7% (2,048) 11.6% (273)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.2% (3,001) 17.3% (408)

Education Levels Comparison: New philadelphia vs Richlands

  • In Richlands, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in New philadelphia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in New philadelphia hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 18.9% in Richlands.
  • More residents in New philadelphia have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 11.6% in Richlands.
  • In Richlands, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 17.2% in New philadelphia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.