Demographics details for New milford, CT vs Upland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New milford, CT vs Upland, CA.
Data | New milford | Upland |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,095 | 78,841 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $70,625 | $93,994 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: New milford vs Upland
- The population in Upland is higher at 78,841, compared to 7,095 in New milford.
- Residents in New milford have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 37.1 years in Upland.
- Upland has a higher median income of $93,994, compared to $70,625 in New milford.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both New milford and Upland at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Upland at 9%, compared to 7% in New milford.
- Upland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in New milford.
Demographics
Demographics New milford vs Upland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New milford | Upland |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 7 |
White | 76 | 22 |
Asian | 4 | 10 |
Hispanic | 10 | 44 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: New milford vs Upland
- In Upland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 4% in New milford.
- New milford has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 22% in Upland.
- In Upland, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 4% in New milford.
- Upland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 10% in New milford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Upland at 16%, compared to 6% in New milford.
- In Upland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New milford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New milford | Upland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.4% |
Depression | 22.1% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 10.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 27.2% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New milford vs Upland
- In Upland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.8% in New milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in New milford at 22.1% compared to 17.8% in Upland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New milford at 13.2% compared to 10.8% in Upland.
- Binge drinking is more common in New milford at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Upland.
- Upland has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 27.2% in New milford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Upland at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in New milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New milford | Upland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (1,036) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (1,531) | 14.1% (11,080) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (710) | 12.3% (9,718) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (1,658) | 23.2% (18,252) |
Education Levels Comparison: New milford vs Upland
- In Upland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in New milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in New milford hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 14.1% in Upland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Upland at 12.3%, compared to 10.0% in New milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in New milford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 23.2% in Upland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.