Demographics details for New london, OH vs Farmington, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, OH vs Farmington, WV.
Data | New london | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,386 | 397 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $50,778 | $54,750 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Farmington
- In New london, the population is higher at 2,386, compared to 397 in Farmington.
- The median age is the same in both New london and Farmington at 37.1 years.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $54,750, compared to $50,778 in New london.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in New london.
- New london has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in New london.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New london | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 93 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 93% in New london.
- Both New london and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New london at 4% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New london and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New london | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 20.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 14.8% |
Depression | 26.4% | 28.3% |
Smoking | 25.2% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 44.0% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 19.7% in New london.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 26.4% in New london.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New london at 25.2% compared to 24.2% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in New london at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in New london at 44.0% compared to 39.5% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in New london at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New london | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (9) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 29.3% (698) | 31.5% (125) |
Less than High School | 18.7% (447) | 8.1% (32) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (124) | 9.8% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in New london have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 29.3% in New london.
- More residents in New london have less than a high school education at 18.7% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 5.2% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.