Demographics details for New london, CT vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, CT vs Summerfield, NC.
| Data | New london | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,980 | 11,111 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,237 | $148,182 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Summerfield
- In New london, the population is higher at 27,980, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $56,237 in New london.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 24.0% in New london.
- New london has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in New london is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New london | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 5 |
| White | 41 | 82 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 17% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 82% compared to 41% in New london.
- In Summerfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in New london.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 29% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New london at 11% compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New london and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New london | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 28.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Summerfield
- More residents in New london report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in New london at 23.3% compared to 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New london at 19.5% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Obesity rates are higher in New london at 37.1% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in New london at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New london | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (399) | 1.0% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (4,487) | 8.8% (973) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (3,830) | 6.1% (674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,738) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of residents in New london have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in New london hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in New london have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.