Demographics details for New london, CT vs Mesa, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, CT vs Mesa, AZ.
| Data | New london | Mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,980 | 512,498 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,237 | $73,766 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Mesa
- The population in Mesa is higher at 512,498, compared to 27,980 in New london.
- The median age in Mesa is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $73,766, compared to $56,237 in New london.
- In Mesa, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 24.0% in New london.
- New london has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Mesa.
- The unemployment rate in New london is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Mesa.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New london | Mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 5 |
| White | 41 | 52 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Mesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 17% compared to 5% in Mesa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mesa at 52% compared to 41% in New london.
- Both New london and Mesa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 29% compared to 27% in Mesa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mesa at 12%, compared to 11% in New london.
- In Mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in New london.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New london | Mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Mesa
- More residents in New london report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.8% in Mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in New london at 23.3% compared to 20.4% in Mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New london at 19.5% compared to 15.8% in Mesa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mesa at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Obesity rates are higher in New london at 37.1% compared to 31.6% in Mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in New london at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New london | Mesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (399) | 1.2% (6,008) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (4,487) | 13.8% (70,489) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (3,830) | 11.9% (60,898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,738) | 19.9% (102,124) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Mesa
- A higher percentage of residents in New london have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in New london hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.8% in Mesa.
- More residents in New london have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 11.9% in Mesa.
- In Mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.