Demographics details for New london, CT vs Gouldsboro, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, CT vs Gouldsboro, PA.
Data | New london | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,980 | 720 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 49.8 years |
Median Income | $56,237 | $50,938 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Gouldsboro
- In New london, the population is higher at 27,980, compared to 720 in Gouldsboro.
- The median age in Gouldsboro is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237 compared to $50,938 in Gouldsboro.
- In Gouldsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 24.0% in New london.
- New london has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Gouldsboro.
- The unemployment rate in New london is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.2% in Gouldsboro.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Gouldsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New london | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 2 |
White | 41 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Gouldsboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 17% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gouldsboro at 93% compared to 41% in New london.
- The Asian population is larger in New london at 2% compared to 0% in Gouldsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 29% compared to 3% in Gouldsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New london at 11% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New london and Gouldsboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New london | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.3% |
Depression | 23.3% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 32.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Gouldsboro
- More residents in New london report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Gouldsboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in New london at 23.3% compared to 22.7% in Gouldsboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New london at 19.5% compared to 18.7% in Gouldsboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gouldsboro at 19.2% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Obesity rates are higher in New london at 37.1% compared to 32.8% in Gouldsboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gouldsboro at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New london | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (399) | 1.4% (10) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (4,487) | 23.2% (167) |
Less than High School | 13.7% (3,830) | 6.4% (46) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,738) | 20.8% (150) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Gouldsboro
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both New london and Gouldsboro at 1.4%.
- In Gouldsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in New london have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 6.4% in Gouldsboro.
- In Gouldsboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 16.9% in New london.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.