Demographics details for New london, CT vs Fort calhoun, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, CT vs Fort calhoun, NE.
Data | New london | Fort calhoun |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,980 | 1,115 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 44.1 years |
Median Income | $56,237 | $75,900 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Fort calhoun
- In New london, the population is higher at 27,980, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- The median age in Fort calhoun is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900, compared to $56,237 in New london.
- In Fort calhoun, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 24.0% in New london.
- New london has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- The unemployment rate in New london is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Fort calhoun provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New london | Fort calhoun |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 1 |
White | 41 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 17% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort calhoun at 85% compared to 41% in New london.
- The Asian population is larger in New london at 2% compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 29% compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New london at 11% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New london and Fort calhoun at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New london | Fort calhoun |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 12.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 7.7% |
Depression | 23.3% | 15.3% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 14.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 22.1% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 33.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Fort calhoun
- More residents in New london report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Depression is more prevalent in New london at 23.3% compared to 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New london at 19.5% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Obesity rates are higher in New london at 37.1% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Disability percentages are higher in New london at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New london | Fort calhoun |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (399) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (4,487) | 33.7% (376) |
Less than High School | 13.7% (3,830) | 6.5% (72) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,738) | 14.4% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of residents in New london have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in New london have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in New london hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.