Demographics details for New london, CT vs Camden, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, CT vs Camden, OH.
| Data | New london | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,980 | 1,973 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,237 | $49,667 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Camden
- In New london, the population is higher at 27,980, compared to 1,973 in Camden.
- The median age in Camden is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237 compared to $49,667 in Camden.
- In Camden, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 24.0% in New london.
- The poverty level is identical in both New london and Camden at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in New london is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Camden.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New london | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 1 |
| White | 41 | 98 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Camden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 17% compared to 1% in Camden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camden at 98% compared to 41% in New london.
- The Asian population is larger in New london at 2% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 29% compared to 0% in Camden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New london at 11% compared to 1% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New london and Camden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New london | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 40.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Camden
- In Camden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in New london.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camden at 24.3% versus 23.3% in New london.
- Camden has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 19.5% in New london.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camden at 18.1% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Camden has higher obesity rates at 40.9% compared to 37.1% in New london.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camden at 26.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New london | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (399) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (4,487) | 31.6% (623) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (3,830) | 9.1% (179) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,738) | 4.9% (96) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Camden
- A higher percentage of residents in New london have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Camden.
- In Camden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.6% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in New london have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 9.1% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in New london hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 4.9% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.