Demographics details for New london, CT vs Boomer, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New london, CT vs Boomer, NC.
| Data | New london | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,980 | 1,213 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $56,237 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: New london vs Boomer
- In New london, the population is higher at 27,980, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- The median age in Boomer is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237 compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- In Boomer, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 24.0% in New london.
- The poverty level is identical in both New london and Boomer at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in New london is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Boomer.
Demographics
Demographics New london vs Boomer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New london | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 5 |
| White | 41 | 91 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New london vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New london at 17% compared to 5% in Boomer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Boomer at 91% compared to 41% in New london.
- The Asian population is larger in New london at 2% compared to 0% in Boomer.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New london at 29% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New london at 11% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New london and Boomer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New london | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New london vs Boomer
- More residents in New london report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Depression is more prevalent in New london at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New london at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Binge drinking is more common in New london at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Obesity rates are higher in New london at 37.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New london | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (399) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (4,487) | 21.2% (257) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (3,830) | 25.9% (314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (4,738) | 9.6% (116) |
Education Levels Comparison: New london vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of residents in New london have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- In Boomer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boomer at 25.9%, compared to 13.7% in New london.
- A higher percentage of residents in New london hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.