Demographics details for New haven, CT vs Carrollton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New haven, CT vs Carrollton, TX.
Data | New haven | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Population | 138,915 | 133,820 |
Median Age | 31.0 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $54,305 | $95,380 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: New haven vs Carrollton
- In New haven, the population is higher at 138,915, compared to 133,820 in Carrollton.
- The median age in Carrollton is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 31.0 years in New haven.
- Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380, compared to $54,305 in New haven.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 21.0% in New haven.
- New haven has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics New haven vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New haven | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 10 |
White | 27 | 31 |
Asian | 5 | 15 |
Hispanic | 30 | 32 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New haven vs Carrollton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New haven at 29% compared to 10% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carrollton at 31% compared to 27% in New haven.
- In Carrollton, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 5% in New haven.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 30% in New haven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrollton at 12%, compared to 9% in New haven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New haven and Carrollton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New haven | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.1% |
Depression | 19.8% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 31.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New haven vs Carrollton
- More residents in New haven report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrollton at 20.9% versus 19.8% in New haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New haven at 19.2% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carrollton at 17.7% compared to 13.0% in New haven.
- Obesity rates are higher in New haven at 37.4% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
- Disability percentages are higher in New haven at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New haven | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (1,674) | 1.6% (2,169) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (21,744) | 12.3% (16,432) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (20,913) | 13.2% (17,673) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.5% (32,679) | 29.8% (39,921) |
Education Levels Comparison: New haven vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in New haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in New haven hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
- More residents in New haven have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 13.2% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 23.5% in New haven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.