Demographics details for New cambria, KS vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New cambria, KS vs Woodstock, VA.
| Data | New cambria | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104 | 5,907 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,601 | $64,470 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: New cambria vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 5,907, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601 compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both New cambria and Woodstock at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 10%, compared to 9% in New cambria.
- The unemployment rate in New cambria is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics New cambria vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New cambria | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 96 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New cambria vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in New cambria.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 11%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New cambria and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New cambria | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New cambria vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 24.9% versus 20.8% in New cambria.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.5% in New cambria.
- Binge drinking is more common in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in New cambria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New cambria | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (118) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (19) | 19.0% (1,121) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (4) | 17.2% (1,018) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (9) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: New cambria vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 18.3% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 17.2%, compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.