Demographics details for New cambria, KS vs Normal, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New cambria, KS vs Normal, IL.
| Data | New cambria | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104 | 52,838 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 25.2 years |
| Median Income | $83,601 | $63,965 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: New cambria vs Normal
- The population in Normal is higher at 52,838, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in New cambria have a higher median age of 30.7 years compared to 25.2 years in Normal.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601 compared to $63,965 in Normal.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in New cambria at 32.0% compared to 29.0% in Normal.
- The poverty level is higher in Normal at 12%, compared to 9% in New cambria.
- Normal has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics New cambria vs Normal provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New cambria | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 13 |
| White | 96 | 73 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New cambria vs Normal
- In Normal, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 73% in Normal.
- In Normal, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in New cambria.
- Normal has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Normal at 4%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New cambria and Normal at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New cambria | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New cambria vs Normal
- In Normal, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Normal at 22.3% versus 20.8% in New cambria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New cambria at 16.5% compared to 15.5% in Normal.
- Binge drinking is more common in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 16.5% in Normal.
- Normal has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- Disability percentages are higher in New cambria at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Normal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New cambria | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (19) | 8.2% (4,307) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (4) | 2.5% (1,335) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (9) | 27.2% (14,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: New cambria vs Normal
- In Normal, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in New cambria hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 8.2% in Normal.
- More residents in New cambria have less than a high school education at 3.8% compared to 2.5% in Normal.
- In Normal, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.