Demographics details for New cambria, KS vs Hobart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New cambria, KS vs Hobart, IN.
| Data | New cambria | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104 | 29,458 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $83,601 | $69,398 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: New cambria vs Hobart
- The population in Hobart is higher at 29,458, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- The median age in Hobart is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601 compared to $69,398 in Hobart.
- In Hobart, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics New cambria vs Hobart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New cambria | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 96 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New cambria vs Hobart
- In Hobart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 63% in Hobart.
- Both New cambria and Hobart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobart at 7%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New cambria and Hobart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New cambria | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New cambria vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hobart at 24.5% versus 20.8% in New cambria.
- Hobart has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 16.5% in New cambria.
- Binge drinking is more common in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 18.9% in Hobart.
- Hobart has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hobart at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in New cambria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New cambria | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (19) | 24.5% (7,227) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (4) | 8.2% (2,428) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (9) | 16.3% (4,813) |
Education Levels Comparison: New cambria vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- In Hobart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 18.3% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobart at 8.2%, compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- In Hobart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.