Demographics details for New cambria, KS vs Bothell, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New cambria, KS vs Bothell, WA.
| Data | New cambria | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104 | 49,017 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $83,601 | $127,944 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: New cambria vs Bothell
- The population in Bothell is higher at 49,017, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- The median age in Bothell is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- Bothell has a higher median income of $127,944, compared to $83,601 in New cambria.
- In Bothell, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Bothell.
- Bothell has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics New cambria vs Bothell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New cambria | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 96 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New cambria vs Bothell
- In Bothell, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 63% in Bothell.
- In Bothell, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 2% in New cambria.
- Bothell has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bothell at 9%, compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New cambria and Bothell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New cambria | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 26.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New cambria vs Bothell
- In Bothell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bothell at 25.7% versus 20.8% in New cambria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New cambria at 16.5% compared to 8.9% in Bothell.
- Binge drinking is more common in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 17.5% in Bothell.
- Obesity rates are higher in New cambria at 33.7% compared to 26.2% in Bothell.
- Disability percentages are higher in New cambria at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Bothell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New cambria | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (19) | 6.4% (3,131) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (4) | 5.8% (2,838) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (9) | 39.0% (19,107) |
Education Levels Comparison: New cambria vs Bothell
- In Bothell, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in New cambria hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 6.4% in Bothell.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bothell at 5.8%, compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- In Bothell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.