Demographics details for New brunswick, NJ vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New brunswick, NJ vs Trumann, AR.
Data | New brunswick | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Population | 55,998 | 7,305 |
Median Age | 24.0 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $57,138 | $37,618 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: New brunswick vs Trumann
- In New brunswick, the population is higher at 55,998, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- The median age in Trumann is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 24.0 years in New brunswick.
- New brunswick has a higher median income of $57,138 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- In Trumann, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 19.0% in New brunswick.
- New brunswick has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Trumann.
- The unemployment rate in New brunswick is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics New brunswick vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New brunswick | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 5 |
White | 17 | 84 |
Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 47 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New brunswick vs Trumann
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New brunswick at 15% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 17% in New brunswick.
- The Asian population is larger in New brunswick at 9% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New brunswick at 47% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- Both New brunswick and Trumann have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in New brunswick at 4% compared to 0% in Trumann.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New brunswick | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.2% |
Depression | 21.0% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New brunswick vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.1% in New brunswick.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 21.0% in New brunswick.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 20.3% in New brunswick.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trumann at 14.4% compared to 12.1% in New brunswick.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 41.1% in New brunswick.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in New brunswick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New brunswick | Trumann |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (941) | 1.8% (135) |
High School Diploma | 12.0% (6,725) | 25.9% (1,895) |
Less than High School | 29.9% (16,733) | 24.4% (1,780) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (6,568) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: New brunswick vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.7% in New brunswick.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 12.0% in New brunswick.
- More residents in New brunswick have less than a high school education at 29.9% compared to 24.4% in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of residents in New brunswick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.