Demographics details for New bern, NC vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New bern, NC vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | New bern | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,539 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,673 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: New bern vs Beaver dam
- In New bern, the population is higher at 31,539, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- The median age is the same in both New bern and Beaver dam at 40.4 years.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $55,673 in New bern.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in New bern at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- New bern has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in New bern is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics New bern vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New bern | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | 3 |
| White | 52 | 81 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New bern vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New bern at 31% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 52% in New bern.
- The Asian population is larger in New bern at 5% compared to 2% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in New bern.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 5% in New bern.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in New bern at 1% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New bern | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New bern vs Beaver dam
- More residents in New bern report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 23.1% in New bern.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New bern at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 15.7% in New bern.
- Obesity rates are higher in New bern at 39.6% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in New bern at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New bern | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (226) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (4,607) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (3,249) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (6,293) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: New bern vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in New bern have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 14.6% in New bern.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 10.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in New bern hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.